www.centos.org Forum Index CentOS 4 - Networking Support Ethereal worked, Wireshark doesn't
|
Bottom Previous Topic Next Topic |
| |
|
|
|---|
| Poster | Thread | Rated: 8 Votes |
|---|
|
Re: Ethereal worked, Wireshark doesn't | #2 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Professional Board Member
![]()
Joined: 2006/4/20
From Montreal/QC
Posts: 1758
|
That differs with program default location /usr/bin As solution add link in /usr/bin to /usr/sbin/dumpcap You may also report it as a bug and put bug number here for reference |
||
|
_________________
Hope this helps, ----------------------------------- FoxB -- http://hbcom.info --------- http://blog.hbcom.info ----------------------------------- |
|||
Posted on: 2006/8/24 19:26
|
|||
|
Re: Ethereal worked, Wireshark doesn't | #3 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Jr Board Member
![]()
Joined: 2006/8/23
From
Posts: 30
|
More info - it looks like a permissions problem:
[jbreher@amitri ~]$ /usr/sbin/tshark tshark: The capture session could not be initiated (socket: Operation not permitted). Please check to make sure you have sufficient permissions, and that you have the proper interface or pipe specified. [jbreher@amitri ~]$ su -c '/usr/sbin/tshark' Password: Capturing on eth0 0.000000 LinksysG_xx:xx:xx -> Spanning-tree-(for-bridges)_00 STP Conf. Root = 32768/00:0c:41:xx:xx:xx Cost = 0 Port = 0x8001 ... (MAC obfuscated) Looks like ethereal did not require root permissions, while wireshark does. I note that the same update contained a new kernel as well. However, I had not rebooted the first time I tried to use wireshark, so I don't believe that is relevant. |
||
Posted on: 2006/8/24 19:31
|
|||
|
Re: Ethereal worked, Wireshark doesn't | #4 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Professional Board Member
![]()
Joined: 2006/4/20
From Montreal/QC
Posts: 1758
|
You are right it requires root permitions (no need to do symlink of dumpcap).
Maybe rpm should be modified to require root permitions... reported as bug# 0001459 http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=1459 |
||
|
_________________
Hope this helps, ----------------------------------- FoxB -- http://hbcom.info --------- http://blog.hbcom.info ----------------------------------- |
|||
Posted on: 2006/8/24 20:05
|
|||
|
Re: Ethereal worked, Wireshark doesn't | #5 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Jr Board Member
![]()
Joined: 2006/8/23
From
Posts: 30
|
Quote:
Is there a way to temoprarily assume the priveliges of root for GUI operations, analogous to the way 'su' operates on the command line? I find I can be productive with ethereal in ways that I am not with tethereal. |
||
Posted on: 2006/8/24 20:59
|
|||
|
Re: Ethereal worked, Wireshark doesn't | #6 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
WebMaster
![]()
Joined: 2004/12/7
From Germany
Posts: 10
|
Quote:
See the page for #1459 (referenced above) for a temporary workaround. This is an error from the upstream provider. This workaround reenables the behaviour of ethereal. Cheers, Ralph |
||
Posted on: 2006/8/25 12:40
|
|||
|
Re: Ethereal worked, Wireshark doesn't | #7 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Jr Board Member
![]()
Joined: 2006/8/23
From
Posts: 30
|
Ralph -
I can confirm that the workaround listed in the bug report, which consists of replacing /etc/pam.d/wireshark, does indeed fix the problem. |
||
Posted on: 2006/8/25 18:26
|
|||
Top Previous Topic Next Topic |
|



Topic options
Print Topic
Threaded
Newest First
8 Votes
jbreher





You cannot start a new topic.
You can view topic.