|
| Poster | Thread |
|---|---|
| ianneub | Posted: 2006/2/16 23:15 Updated: 2006/2/16 23:16 |
Newbie ![]() ![]() Joined: 2004/12/22 From: Posts: 7 |
Changing to port 81 may cause a whole lot of problems. Many people may have firewalls, proxy servers, corporate policy, etc that get in a the way of this change. See http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=3102&forum=28
|
| Poster | Thread |
|---|---|
| jywang | Posted: 2006/2/17 2:28 Updated: 2006/2/17 2:28 |
Newbie ![]() ![]() Joined: 2006/2/17 From: Posts: 6 |
Dear Sir or Madam,
Why not use port 80 to let ALL squid and iptables work happier? BRs. |
|
|
|
| Poster | Thread |
|---|---|
| tashirosgt | Posted: 2006/3/10 1:49 Updated: 2006/3/10 1:49 |
Newbie ![]() ![]() Joined: 2006/3/9 From: Posts: 1 |
Just a thought: Many computers are not connected to the internet or only have a slow connection. There would be some merit in providing (say) yearly updates in the format of a program that could run from cds. Perhaps the places that sell cds of Linux distributions would also begin selling such cds if they were called "service packs".
|
|
| Poster | Thread |
|---|---|
| karmapolis | Posted: 2006/5/5 23:28 Updated: 2006/5/5 23:28 |
Newbie ![]() ![]() Joined: 2006/5/5 From: Posts: 5 |
I suggest that you add an option to the new mirrorlist.centos.org script so that corporate users are able to query specifically for rsync mirrors to build their intranet mirrors. This way, one could write a script to automatically choose from one server on that list, instead of having to rely on the only fixed one (the master rsync server) which is probably already burdened. For example, instead of...
http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?release=$releasever&arch=$basearch&repo=os ... one might try this one... http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?release=$releasever&arch=$basearch&repo=os&proto=rsync ... to get *only* rsync mirrors that are "nearby" (in GeoIP terms). |
|
|








