Search found 32824 matches
- 2024/05/08 13:07:16
- Forum: CentOS 7 - General Support
- Topic: Openssh upgrade
- Replies: 7
- Views: 471
Re: Openssh upgrade
Elevate sounds good but before use, a backup of the original is essential.
- 2024/05/07 15:08:17
- Forum: CentOS 7 - General Support
- Topic: NIC Related Clarification
- Replies: 2
- Views: 171
Re: NIC Related Clarification
Check you don't have duplicate files pertaining to the same adapter in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts
- 2024/05/05 16:09:43
- Forum: CentOS 7 - General Support
- Topic: Openssh upgrade
- Replies: 7
- Views: 471
Re: Openssh upgrade
The "issues" you will face are that CentOS 7 dies in two months so there will be no more updates for it, security or otherwise. It's a dead distro that should not be used any more and certainly not after 2 months time. Putting a lot of work into updating openssh on it is pointless as the entirety of...
- 2024/05/05 14:04:27
- Forum: CentOS 7 - General Support
- Topic: Openssh upgrade
- Replies: 7
- Views: 471
Re: Openssh upgrade
No. And it's not worth the effort of trying either since CentOS 7 goes EOL in less than 2 months time. Pick a new distro and start your migration to it.
CentOS is dead, you need to move to something else.
CentOS is dead, you need to move to something else.
- 2024/05/02 15:42:45
- Forum: CentOS 7 - General Support
- Topic: Centos 7 Increase CMA Size
- Replies: 2
- Views: 291
Re: Centos 7 Increase CMA Size
Check in /proc/cmdline to see if your changes took effect.
- 2024/04/30 00:29:35
- Forum: CentOS Social
- Topic: Any secret news for CentOS having anew version?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 341
Re: Any secret news for CentOS having anew version?
CentOS is dead. Use one of the other RHEL rebuilds instead.
- 2024/04/29 09:11:34
- Forum: CentOS 7 - Security Support
- Topic: CVE-2023-6931
- Replies: 2
- Views: 533
Re: CVE-2023-6931
https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-6931 RHEL 7 is listed as "Out of support scope" which means it's too old and the vulnerability not important enough. It also says It is not possible to trigger this issue with the default kernel.perf_event_paranoid sysctl value 2. You may check it with...
- 2024/04/28 13:49:39
- Forum: 8 /8-Stream / 9-Stream - General Support
- Topic: in.tftpd[683]: chroot: Operation not permitted
- Replies: 10
- Views: 1020
Re: in.tftpd[683]: chroot: Operation not permitted
Is this a real system or a container?
- 2024/04/27 16:25:14
- Forum: 8 /8-Stream / 9-Stream - General Support
- Topic: in.tftpd[683]: chroot: Operation not permitted
- Replies: 10
- Views: 1020
Re: in.tftpd[683]: chroot: Operation not permitted
bash-4.4# ls -laZ /var/lib/tftpboot total 2 drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root system_u:object_r:container_file_t:s0:c128,c144 1024 Jan 4 16:00 . drwxr-xr-x. 15 root root system_u:object_r:container_file_t:s0:c128,c144 1024 Apr 27 15:41 .. -rwxrwxrwx. 1 root root system_u:object_r:container_file_t:s0:c128,c14...
- 2024/04/27 15:51:16
- Forum: 8 /8-Stream / 9-Stream - General Support
- Topic: Samba 4.17.11 DRS Replication Issues
- Replies: 1
- Views: 208
Re: Samba 4.17.11 DRS Replication Issues
This looks like a question for a samba forum not here.