Hi All
output from dmesg, what is this related ?
Should I be worried?
Centos 6.5
sanevda:________:1A11D540; E(25); LPC write size is 512 instead of 32; tt_lpc_handler()
sanefs:________:9AD96040; E(25); LPC write size is 512 instead of 32; tt_lpc_handler()
sanebd:________:9AD96040; E(25); LPC write size is 512 instead of 32; tt_lpc_handler()
sanevda:________:9AD96040; E(25); LPC write size is 512 instead of 32; tt_lpc_handler()
sanefs:________:9AD96040; E(25); LPC write size is 512 instead of 32; tt_lpc_handler()
Thanks
dmesg errors?LPC write size is 512 instead of 32; tt_lpc_handler()
Re: dmesg errors?LPC write size is 512 instead of 32; tt_lpc_handler()
If you're running CentOS 6.5 you should be worried - it has 4-5 years of accumulated security problems.
Re: dmesg errors?LPC write size is 512 instead of 32; tt_lpc_handler()
Run yum update then reboot into the new kernel and umpty zillion other updates that have been released for CentOS 6 in the last 5 years since 6.5.
Do you have a scanner attached to the system?
Do you have a scanner attached to the system?
The future appears to be RHEL or Debian. I think I'm going Debian.
Info for USB installs on http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/InstallFromUSBkey
CentOS 5 and 6 are deadest, do not use them.
Use the FAQ Luke
Info for USB installs on http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/InstallFromUSBkey
CentOS 5 and 6 are deadest, do not use them.
Use the FAQ Luke
Re: dmesg errors?LPC write size is 512 instead of 32; tt_lpc_handler()
no scanner, 10gb fcoe card, hpe qlogic card, hpe sas drives, backup software
Re: dmesg errors?LPC write size is 512 instead of 32; tt_lpc_handler()
So do sanevda, sanefs and sanebd mean something to you?
The future appears to be RHEL or Debian. I think I'm going Debian.
Info for USB installs on http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/InstallFromUSBkey
CentOS 5 and 6 are deadest, do not use them.
Use the FAQ Luke
Info for USB installs on http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/InstallFromUSBkey
CentOS 5 and 6 are deadest, do not use them.
Use the FAQ Luke