CentOS7.5 Update Repo 20.9.2018 doubled rpms

Issues related to applications and software problems
Post Reply
frankwinkler
Posts: 2
Joined: 2018/08/28 05:17:00

CentOS7.5 Update Repo 20.9.2018 doubled rpms

Post by frankwinkler » 2018/08/28 05:30:34

Currently we got errors on kickstart installation of CentOS 7.5 with spacewalk2.5/2.6: Package 770/1324 (kexec-tools) can not be downloaded.
The problem seems to be caused by doubled rpms (with same version/name but different build dates) in different CentOS7.5 repos (os and update).
These rpms in update repo were delivered on 20th of August 2018.
E.g. rpm kexec-tools rpm:
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7.5.180 ... x86_64.rpm
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7.5.180 ... x86_64.rpm
and tuned rpm
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7.5.180 ... noarch.rpm
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7.5.180 ... noarch.rpm
There are perhaps more.

Was it really intended ???

User avatar
TrevorH
Site Admin
Posts: 33216
Joined: 2009/09/24 10:40:56
Location: Brighton, UK

Re: CentOS7.5 Update Repo 20.9.2018 doubled rpms

Post by TrevorH » 2018/08/28 09:16:25

That looks wrong. Please raise a bug on https://bugs.centos.org and I will ping the maintainer to get this fixed.
The future appears to be RHEL or Debian. I think I'm going Debian.
Info for USB installs on http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/InstallFromUSBkey
CentOS 5 and 6 are deadest, do not use them.
Use the FAQ Luke

hughesjr
Site Admin
Posts: 254
Joined: 2004/12/05 01:51:26
Location: Corpus Christi, Texas, USA
Contact:

Re: CentOS7.5 Update Repo 20.9.2018 doubled rpms

Post by hughesjr » 2018/08/28 12:37:55

Thanks for the question.

I found the issue (they released those two updates to the c7-alt tree .. our builder built them for the c7 tree).

I am fixing the issue now and will change some scripting to prevent it in the future.

frankwinkler
Posts: 2
Joined: 2018/08/28 05:17:00

Re: CentOS7.5 Update Repo 20.9.2018 doubled rpms

Post by frankwinkler » 2018/08/29 07:10:49

Great! Thank you! Then bugreport 0015221 can be closed as well.

Post Reply