Driver for monitor ACER KA272 Abi

Issues related to applications and software problems
Post Reply
javierja2000
Posts: 11
Joined: 2007/02/08 13:15:43

Driver for monitor ACER KA272 Abi

Post by javierja2000 » 2023/09/28 09:55:58

Hello. Is there any driver for this terminal model or compatible for CentOS7?. Thanks.

User avatar
TrevorH
Site Admin
Posts: 33224
Joined: 2009/09/24 10:40:56
Location: Brighton, UK

Re: Driver for monitor ACER KA272 Abi

Post by TrevorH » 2023/09/28 10:30:33

It's not the monitor, it's the graphics card it is attached to. Run lspci -nn | grep -i vga and if that doesn't tell you what driver you need then post the output here.
The future appears to be RHEL or Debian. I think I'm going Debian.
Info for USB installs on http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/InstallFromUSBkey
CentOS 5 and 6 are deadest, do not use them.
Use the FAQ Luke

javierja2000
Posts: 11
Joined: 2007/02/08 13:15:43

Re: Driver for monitor ACER KA272 Abi

Post by javierja2000 » 2023/09/28 10:42:48

Thanks for your information.
I wrote the command and this is the response:
[root@localhost ~]# lspci -mm | grep -i vga
00:02.0 "VGA compatible controller" "Intel Corporation" "Device 4692" -r0c "ASRock Incorporation" "Device 4692"

OK. And now ...?

javierja2000
Posts: 11
Joined: 2007/02/08 13:15:43

Re: Driver for monitor ACER KA272 Abi

Post by javierja2000 » 2023/09/28 10:46:08

Sorry.
This is the response:

[root@localhost ~]# lspci -nn | grep -i vga
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Intel Corporation Device [8086:4692] (rev 0c)
[root@localhost ~]# ^C

What am I supposed to do now?
Thanks

User avatar
TrevorH
Site Admin
Posts: 33224
Joined: 2009/09/24 10:40:56
Location: Brighton, UK

Re: Driver for monitor ACER KA272 Abi

Post by TrevorH » 2023/09/28 13:09:46

Run a more recent distro than CentOS 7?

That video card is "Alder Lake-S GT1 [UHD Graphics 730]" which means you are trying to run a nearly 10 year old distro on hardware from 2022 or 2023. CentOS 7 was released in 2014 and got new hardware support for the first 5 years of its life so you should be OK on hardware manufactured prior to 2019 (2018 to be safe!) but trying to run something that's 10 years old on a machine that's less than a year old is not going to work.

If you must have CentOS 7 then I suspect your only option is to install a newer distro and then run CentOS 7 as a VM.

In any case, CentOS 7 only has about 9 months of life left so it is pretty pointless trying to install it on new machines now as you will be repeating the process in a few months when it goes EOL.
The future appears to be RHEL or Debian. I think I'm going Debian.
Info for USB installs on http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/InstallFromUSBkey
CentOS 5 and 6 are deadest, do not use them.
Use the FAQ Luke

javierja2000
Posts: 11
Joined: 2007/02/08 13:15:43

Re: Driver for monitor ACER KA272 Abi

Post by javierja2000 » 2023/09/29 06:02:11

The problem is that I must have CentOS7 installed for a year since I belong to a University and they want it installed for research purposes. Thanks a lot.

User avatar
jlehtone
Posts: 4532
Joined: 2007/12/11 08:17:33
Location: Finland

Re: Driver for monitor ACER KA272 Abi

Post by jlehtone » 2023/09/29 07:47:13

TrevorH wrote:
2023/09/28 13:09:46
... install a newer distro and then run CentOS 7 as a VM.
This fulfills the "must have 7" requirement ... even though you will have also a "second machine".


"Research purposes" (except perhaps archeology) tends to desire bleeding edge.

User avatar
TrevorH
Site Admin
Posts: 33224
Joined: 2009/09/24 10:40:56
Location: Brighton, UK

Re: Driver for monitor ACER KA272 Abi

Post by TrevorH » 2023/09/29 10:26:15

Are they researching security and how easy it is to exploit an old and unmaintained system?
The future appears to be RHEL or Debian. I think I'm going Debian.
Info for USB installs on http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/InstallFromUSBkey
CentOS 5 and 6 are deadest, do not use them.
Use the FAQ Luke

javierja2000
Posts: 11
Joined: 2007/02/08 13:15:43

Re: Driver for monitor ACER KA272 Abi

Post by javierja2000 » 2023/09/29 10:34:40

No, no ... ;) ;) ;)

Post Reply