I'm looking for some new features that Podman 5.0 is bringing.
Anyone knows if it is going to be available in CentOS Stream 9?
Is Podman 5.0 coming to CentOS Stream 9?
Re: Is Podman 5.0 coming to CentOS Stream 9?
Yes, probably CentOS Stream 9.5, according to https://github.com/containers/podman/discussions/22592
I am already using in on RHEL 9.4, after I found a build at https://kojihub.stream.centos.org/koji/ ... ldID=61248 and installed it with
I am already using in on RHEL 9.4, after I found a build at https://kojihub.stream.centos.org/koji/ ... ldID=61248 and installed it with
Code: Select all
$ sudo dnf install https://kojihub.stream.centos.org/kojifiles/packages/podman/5.0.2/1.el9/x86_64/podman-5.0.2-1.el9.x86_64.rpm
Last metadata expiration check: 0:34:27 ago on Fri May 24 14:05:03 2024.
podman-5.0.2-1.el9.x86_64.rpm 166 MB/s | 16 MB 00:00
Dependencies resolved.
============================================================================================================================================================================================================================================
Package Architecture Version Repository Size
============================================================================================================================================================================================================================================
Installing dependencies:
passt x86_64 0^20231204.gb86afe3-1.el9 rhel-9-Server-appstream-os 190 k
passt-selinux noarch 0^20231204.gb86afe3-1.el9 rhel-9-Server-appstream-os 32 k
Downgrading:
podman x86_64 2:5.0.2-1.el9 @commandline 16 M
Transaction Summary
============================================================================================================================================================================================================================================
Install 2 Packages
Downgrade 1 Package
Total size: 16 M
Total download size: 222 k
Is this ok [y/N]: y
Downloading Packages:
(1/2): passt-selinux-0^20231204.gb86afe3-1.el9.noarch.rpm 271 kB/s | 32 kB 00:00
(2/2): passt-0^20231204.gb86afe3-1.el9.x86_64.rpm 1.2 MB/s | 190 kB 00:00
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total 1.4 MB/s | 222 kB 00:00
Running transaction check
Transaction check succeeded.
Running transaction test
Transaction test succeeded.
Running transaction
Preparing : 1/1
Installing : passt-0^20231204.gb86afe3-1.el9.x86_64 1/4
Running scriptlet: passt-selinux-0^20231204.gb86afe3-1.el9.noarch 2/4
Installing : passt-selinux-0^20231204.gb86afe3-1.el9.noarch 2/4
Running scriptlet: passt-selinux-0^20231204.gb86afe3-1.el9.noarch 2/4
Downgrading : podman-2:5.0.2-1.el9.x86_64 3/4
Running scriptlet: podman-4:4.9.4-3.el9_4.x86_64 4/4
Cleanup : podman-4:4.9.4-3.el9_4.x86_64 4/4
Running scriptlet: passt-selinux-0^20231204.gb86afe3-1.el9.noarch 4/4
Running scriptlet: podman-4:4.9.4-3.el9_4.x86_64 4/4
Verifying : podman-2:5.0.2-1.el9.x86_64 1/4
Verifying : podman-4:4.9.4-3.el9_4.x86_64 2/4
Verifying : passt-selinux-0^20231204.gb86afe3-1.el9.noarch 3/4
Verifying : passt-0^20231204.gb86afe3-1.el9.x86_64 4/4
Downgraded:
podman-2:5.0.2-1.el9.x86_64
Installed:
passt-0^20231204.gb86afe3-1.el9.x86_64 passt-selinux-0^20231204.gb86afe3-1.el9.noarch
Complete!
Re: Is Podman 5.0 coming to CentOS Stream 9?
Bit odd that the epoch is wrong on that so it shows up as a downgrade not an upgrade. Also means that any yum update will back that out if it's isn't excluded.
The future appears to be RHEL or Debian. I think I'm going Debian.
Info for USB installs on http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/InstallFromUSBkey
CentOS 5 and 6 are deadest, do not use them.
Use the FAQ Luke
Info for USB installs on http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/InstallFromUSBkey
CentOS 5 and 6 are deadest, do not use them.
Use the FAQ Luke
Re: Is Podman 5.0 coming to CentOS Stream 9?
Installing random packages from the CentOS buildservice onto RHEL is always a risky desperate move. I'll mention to somebody the downgrade thing, that's indeed look wrong. Thanks for raising it.