13:04:20 <hhorak> #startmeeting SCLo SIG sync-up (2017-04-18)
13:04:20 <centbot> Meeting started Tue Apr 18 13:04:20 2017 UTC.  The chair is hhorak. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
13:04:20 <centbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic.
13:04:23 <dgilmore> alphacc: it actually uses the pykickstart api
13:04:30 <hhorak> #meetingname sclo-sig-syncup
13:04:30 <centbot> The meeting name has been set to 'sclo-sig-syncup'
13:04:30 <dgilmore> and does not call ksflatten direct
13:04:35 <dgilmore> but its the same outcome
13:04:39 <alphacc> dgilmore: ok I'll a look to the code
13:05:09 <alphacc> hi hhorak o/
13:05:31 <hhorak> hello alphacc and others :)
13:07:05 <dgilmore> alphacc: seach for Kickstart in kojid
13:09:21 <lpancescu> alphacc, dgilmore: prepareKickstart only changes the repos, it doesn't seem to touch any other sections - see https://pagure.io/koji/blob/master/f/builder/kojid#_2682
13:10:27 <lpancescu> i assume KickstartParser from pykickstarter ignores the %addon section when parsing, since kojid doesn't seem to be doing explicitly?
13:11:07 <lpancescu> btw, pagure doesn't allow me even to select a range of lines :(
13:12:11 <hhorak> It seems not many SCL fans here today, so just quick update..
13:12:31 <hhorak> RHSCL 2.4 Beta was released -- https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Software_Collections/2-Beta/html/2.4_Release_Notes/index.html
13:12:45 <hhorak> and we already have quite a lot of packages rebuilt..
13:13:01 <hhorak> now we need to check that they are sane and tag them to testing..
13:13:13 <alphacc> hhorak++
13:13:39 <hhorak> (my hope was to start last week, but Easter....)
13:13:51 <lpancescu> are there any plans to also update sclo-vagrant1? i think it's not part of RHSCL
13:14:44 <hhorak> lpancescu: there are, but I'm not sure where it is now.. pvalena can share more ^
13:16:11 <lpancescu> hhorak: yes, pvalena mentioned an update to a patched 1.8.5 "soon" - this was a few months ago, was just wondering if there are any news. sorry for disturbing
13:17:37 <hhorak> lpancescu: IIRC, the plans changed to rebase to 1.9 instead
13:18:50 <lpancescu> hhorak: ack, thanks :)
13:19:07 <hhorak> as for SCLo bugs on bugs.c.o -- Evolution told he planned to look at https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=12844 (link to signing keys), so hopefully it will be resolved soon..
13:20:17 <hhorak> and there is now a new one -- https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=13125 (sources for rh-namespace packages)
13:20:35 <hhorak> alphacc: I actually did not know that there is something like http://vault.centos.org/centos/6/sclo/Source/sclo/
13:21:03 <hhorak> does that contain koji srpms?
13:21:26 <pvalena> lpancescu: yes, it's in progress.  think  will have some testing builds soon
13:21:30 <hhorak> alphacc: (not sure whether you are the best person to ask(
13:21:33 <pvalena> sorry for delay
13:22:27 <hhorak> pvalena: any ETA? (optimistic/pessimistic)
13:24:01 <lpancescu> pvalena: it's not really a problem for our selftests, we don't even use private-networking right now. it's just that it would be nice to be closer to what our users are using. thanks. :)
13:25:46 <pvalena> hhorak: lpancescu: I expect builds in testing by the second half of may
13:25:51 <pvalena> = optimistic :)
13:26:08 <lpancescu> :)
13:26:58 <pvalena> not sure about pesimistic :) I don't like being pesimistic :) maybe a month or two more at the worst
13:30:11 <pvalena> I am rebasing the collection with newer ruby SCL - rh-ruby23 - so It's a bit tricky :)
13:31:14 <hhorak> pvalena: thanks for sharing more insight
13:31:44 <pvalena> lpancescu: and now that new rh-ruby24 is out, would it be an issue for you? I do not think it shloud be trouble for me with switching to either of those
13:33:58 <hhorak> kbsingh: maybe you can help here... http://vault.centos.org/centos/6/sclo/Source/sclo/ exists and http://vault.centos.org/centos/6/sclo/Source/rh not... (https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=13125)
13:34:42 <lpancescu> pvalena: i don't think so, the ruby version shouldn't affect me in any way. not sure what the vagrant reqs are wrt ruby version
13:35:15 <pvalena> hhorak: additionally yes, the 1.9 seems ideal
13:38:50 <pvalena> lpancescu: It works fine in Fedora: Ruby 2.4 + Vagrant 1.9
13:40:08 <lpancescu> sounds good - then it should also work for us
13:45:47 <hhorak> alphacc: kbsingh: I've added you to CC for https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=13125, let me know if a separate issue needs to be opened or if I should ask someone else..
13:46:01 <hhorak> ok, anything else for SCL?
13:55:37 <hhorak> no SCL topics any more, thanks and see you later..
13:55:40 <hhorak> #endmeeting