13:58:37 <hhorak> #startmeeting SCLo SIG sync-up (2017-03-21)
13:58:37 <centbot> Meeting started Tue Mar 21 13:58:37 2017 UTC.  The chair is hhorak. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
13:58:37 <centbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic.
13:58:50 <hhorak> #meetingname sclo-sig-syncup
13:58:50 <centbot> The meeting name has been set to 'sclo-sig-syncup'
13:58:55 <hhorak> hello scl folks!
14:01:46 <RemiFedora> _o/
14:02:54 <hhorak> RemiFedora: Hi, at least someone :)
14:04:47 <RemiFedora> hhorak, just a followup about https://blog.remirepo.net/post/2017/02/23/Additional-PHP-packages-for-RHSCL
14:05:23 <RemiFedora> most commonly asked extensions should be there, so making the SCL more "usable"
14:05:48 <RemiFedora> btw, the EPEL workaround is still only a workaround... but it works...
14:05:56 <pvalena> hi :)
14:06:55 <hhorak> RemiFedora: I forgot how the question about when/whether the EPEL will be rebuilt in cbs was answered.. Do you know whether there are already some plans for now?
14:07:05 <RemiFedora> no
14:10:18 <hhorak> RemiFedora: so what will happen when epel package will bump version, you need to rebuild you packages?
14:10:38 <RemiFedora> by EPEL update policy, this should not happen ;)
14:11:15 <hhorak> RemiFedora: right :)
14:11:20 <RemiFedora> and BTW, all these libs are dead project (reason why missing in RHEL/CentOS), so this should not happen :p
14:11:49 <hhorak> one advantage of having dead upstream :)
14:12:31 <RemiFedora> but probably the only one...
14:14:47 <hhorak> alphacc: around? (I wanted to remind myself with https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=12962)
14:18:10 <hhorak> never mind, it is not something extra important..
14:18:51 <hhorak> One announcement I should have done already several weeks back -- we have a project on bugs.centos.org
14:20:02 <hhorak> and now we already have some bugs (I just need to figure out where in my inbox notifications were put)
14:20:24 <hhorak> anyway, there is one issue I don't really understand, it's about keys.. https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=12844
14:21:06 <hhorak> I would like to not look like an idiot, so I wanted to ask here before replying :)
14:21:12 <RemiFedora> hhorak, the SCLO key is missing on this page
14:22:20 <hhorak> RemiFedora: but is it the same key that we link to in the centos-release-sclo package (the repo package)
14:22:21 <hhorak> ?
14:22:40 <RemiFedora> yes, but some people ask to have it on the web site, to be able to check it
14:24:21 <hhorak> and is there a reason to not include just link there?
14:25:48 <RemiFedora> oh wait , "pub  2048R/F2EE9D55 2015-10-01 CentOS SoftwareCollections SIG (https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/SCLo) <security@centos.org>"
14:25:59 <RemiFedora> it seems it is there now, so this bug can probably be closed
14:26:55 <hhorak> RemiFedora: maybe it was created before this was added, I just wanted to check whether this should be enough..
14:27:02 <hhorak> ..to validate rpm
14:37:54 <hhorak> One another thing, there is one idea how to make at least the deamons packaged as SCL more usable for users.. I'd like to get any feedback: http://www.themindiseverything.eu/2017/03/software-collections-daemons-made.html
14:38:05 <hhorak> Anybody else something?
14:40:51 <hhorak> does not seem so.. closing in 1 minute..
14:45:35 <gwd> sbonazzo lsm5 BTW, I have a meeting conflict today; do you guys want to 1) do the meeting without me, 2) postpone it for an hour, or 2) skip this one and see you in two weeks?
14:47:41 <lsm5> gwd: i vote for skipping
14:47:47 <lsm5> i don't have an update this time
14:48:53 <hhorak> #endmeeting